Themis — fraud referral and filing
Most fraud research dies in a folder. It is correct, it is thorough, and it never reaches anyone with the authority to do something, because the gap between knowing and filing is procedural work that nobody enjoys.
Themis closes that gap. The deliverable is a referral dossier: the finding, the evidence chain behind it, and the filing itself, formatted for the specific body that will receive it.
Engagement-priced, per matter.
What we have actually filed
Not a capability statement. Our own filings, as of 8 September 2026:
| Filings submitted | 9 |
| Distinct bodies | 8 |
| Award-eligible | 4 |
| Filed between | 29 August and 8 September 2026 |
The bodies: the SEC, the CFTC, the IRS Whistleblower Office, the FinCEN Office of the Whistleblower, the FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center, the Texas State Securities Board, the Texas State Office of Administrative Hearings, and the Wyoming Secretary of State, Compliance Division.
We are not naming the subject, and will not while a matter is live. That is the discipline the work requires, and a firm that advertises its live referrals is telling you what it will one day do with yours.
Why the count matters more than a case study
Four of those nine are award-eligible, which means they cleared the programme's own bar for a substantive, original submission — the regulator's threshold, not ours.
The other five went to bodies with no award programme at all, because the right destination for a finding is the one that can act on it rather than the one that pays. A referral practice optimised for award eligibility files in the wrong places.
How a matter runs
1. Assessment. You bring what you have. We tell you plainly whether there is a filing in it, and if there is not, we say so and stop. That conversation is where most of the value is, and it is the one nobody wants to charge for.
2. Evidence construction. On-chain provenance from nodes we run, corporate-registry work across jurisdictions, sanctions and export-control screening, and open-source corroboration — assembled so each claim in the dossier points at the record behind it.
3. Selection. Which body, and why. This is a real decision: the same facts can be a securities matter, a tax matter, a money-transmission matter or a state registration matter, and the strongest version of the filing is rarely the most obvious one.
4. The dossier. Written to the receiving body's form and evidentiary expectations, with exhibits indexed and a narrative that survives being read by somebody who has thirty other files on their desk.
5. Filing and tracking. Submitted, with the reference recorded and the docket watched, because a filing you stop following is a filing you have abandoned.
What we are not
We are not investigators for hire. We are a research and analysis firm. Texas Occupations Code §1702.101 makes offering unlicensed investigative services a violation, and we would rather state that on the page than after you have asked for something we cannot do.
We are not your lawyers. A referral dossier is research product. Whistleblower award programmes have counsel requirements, filing deadlines and anonymity rules that vary by programme, and you should have a lawyer for those. We work alongside yours.
We do not promise an outcome. No one can. Regulators decline matters that deserve attention, and award determinations take years. What we control is whether the filing is complete, correct, correctly addressed, and tracked.